Kho Writing T2 · Band 6.0–7.5 Essays

Nowadays, in era of the globalization, many people from all around the world become connect together. Students who engage the international student exchange program is so popular these day. In the interm, some teachers opine that studying in other countries could have numerous benefits while others do not believe in the positive impacts of transferring. However, there are others thinking of it as disadvantages.

The first reason is that students exchage have some benefits on teenager school student. They can improve their personal skill. This is because that will make them more independent and graduatelly know about new school and place living in. If students exchange live far from their home, they will get a part-time job or something else to gain money. That will help teenager have more experiences than previous life.

From a diffirent view, international student exchange also have negative effects. They may learn one more language while it taking much time to study. Meanwhile, language barrier will happen when student can not understand eachother. Furthermore, in a diffirent language may result in a lower performance of students. Last but not least, a sense of isolution is inevitable while starting to live in a new place, they can not develop their social skills.

To put it in a nutshell, with respect to the whole views mentioned above, exchanging teenagers have both merits and demerits. However, it is recommended to take steps carefully when deciding about children life. Due to the importance of teenagers mental health and all negative effects following the exchanging process, it is better to replace transferring minors with weekly tour tips in order to gain some experience.

It is believed that math is the key catalyst for business success. Although a firm understanding of math will benefit business management, I somewhat disagree that it is an essential element of the business world.

Proponents of this sentiment claim that insightful knowledge in mathematics principles is of paramount importance in managing the cash flow of an enterprise. This is because money is often positively correlated with business growth, resulting in many commercial organisations using mathematical formulae for financial analysis or inventory management. A prime example of this is Nike, a multinational selling sportswear, introducing a new set of collections to the market. Prior to this, they invested a large sum in determining the retail price to not only retain its comparative advantage against its competitors but also make sufficient profit to cover any incurring expenses.

Nonetheless, I rather believe mathematical ability is pale in comparison with other fundamental factors that contribute to business prosperity. There are a wide range of elemental components that a key managerial personnel should possess including planning, decision-making or delegation. The case of Elon Musk soundly exemplifies this. Under his management, Tesla has grown to be the world-leading company in electric car production due to his ability in talent recruitment and a strategically outstanding vision for business development.

In conclusion, while insightfulmmathematical knowledge can assist greatly in financial management, I partially disagree that entrepreneurs should be highly competent in this discipline because they need more essential traits to succeed. Where possible, business owners should assign math-related tasks to specialists and focus more on other important areas of Interest.

Many people argue that global international sports event are bring a great deal benefits for host country. Although I agree with this idea, I am of the opinion that these events cause significant damage to host nation in terms of environmental pollution and the imbalance of nation’s fund.

On the one hand, there are some strong reasons why I believe that international sports events are beneficial for hosting. The first benefit would be that they boost local tourism and economic growth. This can be by the fact that global events attract enormous visitors from four corners so creating more job opportunities. As a result, citizens will make more significant taxes contribution to the government which can enhance economic growth. Another positive is that it is a golden chance for host nation to introduce to foreign people about its historical and traditional values.

On the other hand, beside several benefits mentioned above, it seems to me that they cause environmental problems in these countries. Numerous tourists visited those countries mean that an increasing a huge amount of waste discharging in to river, atmosphere which lead to water and oil contamination. Another problem is a host country have spend a large amount of money on constructing infrastructures to organize these events. This means that other important sectors such as education or medical which bring immediately benefits for any nation would receive less funding.

In conclusion, while I strongly believe that a country have some positives when becoming host of national sport events, I would argue that they create a several drawbacks. It is advisable that host country should make a balance between support for them and other crucial sectors.

It is true that going to university to acquire academic knowledge is crucial in our lives, and the tuition fee should be free throughout the country to make sure that everyone can get an education. Personally, I totally disagree with the view above.

On the one hand, eliminating the tuition fee for people regardless of their background finance could be beneficial to some extent. There are many disadvantaged people who do not have a chance to approach education because of their impoverishment. Therefore, free charge in university could increase more opportunities for people to get an academic education. For example, in several developing countries in Europe, the chance to go to university or college is approximately the same for everyone because they do not take any education fees from students or rarely.

On the other hand, charging students in university or college is usually the thing that is necessary for schools for various reasons. First of all, schools need a tremendous amount of money to develop school facilities and teaching quality. Therefore, it might be a deterrent for the government to allocate money equally for each school in the country and make it free for citizens because the government's educational budget is limited. Secondly, cutting down the tuition fees might not be vital because numerous ways could ensure that everyone can be a student. For instance, governments can operate scholarship foundations for excellent students or students in impoverished circumstances. Therefore, students who need education could undoubtedly take their opportunities by their effort.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the government should have more solutions to bridge the chance to go to university between people from different backgrounds, however, should not demolish the school fees.

It is true that these days, solely a handful of the young generation tends to go to classical music concerts or plays and performances in theater. There are several explanations about this phenomenon, namely the appearance of new music and the internalization. From my perspective, it is necessary to incentive the young to be involved in more classical music plays and performances.

There are a couple of reasons why the younger generation do not have a habit of attending classical music concerts. The first explanation is that because of the appearance of electronic music. The young generation have a tendency to listen to EDM instead of the classic due to the common fact that this kind represents modern and vibrant life which is suitable for the speed of life pace in this day and age. In addition, some people argue that the classical music is internalized belonging to the old people. As almost all classical music songs were composed several years and decades ago, people, especially the young, tend to suppose that it is too old to listen.

In my opinion, I am convinced that it is essential for the government to encourage the young to attend more classical music plays and performances because it supports preserving the cultural identity. The politicians should instantly operate several campaigns for the young which require them to research and analyze classical music. Giving material incentives is an effective way to promote the enthusiasm of the young people.

In conclusion, owing to the appearance of EDM and the unreasonable internalization, the majority of young people do not have a habit of visiting the theater to enjoy classical music. The government should provide some campaigns to encourage them to explore classical music. It is predicted that if the authorities apply this approach, the cultural identity could be preserved.

People have different opinions about whether parents should take their offspring to school at a very early age or procast it until at least 7 years old. From my point of view, I strongly believe that having an early start would be more beneficial than a later commencement.

On the one hand, there are some advantages when children follow official education at 7 years old at least, undoubtedly. Firstly, there will be more chances for kids to accumulate soft skills, meaningful experiences at home, which stem from their parents or grandparents. As a result, children would become more mature due to having knowledgement not only about skills and good behaviors that obtained from parent, but also belief and ritual of their own family as well. This is a good way to pass down family traditions effectively to children. Last but not least, applying the prescribed age to go to school at least 7 years old incentivises children to have childhood, which does not regularly happen in the advanced technology era like the present. From that, they can acquire their own interests and skills that they have a burning passion for.

On the other hand, I am totally convinced by the view that youngsters should be empowered to go to school early. Understandably, they will have a head start over their peers pursuing higher education or gaining competitive jobs. Certainly, the more competitive job chances they get, the more potential job promotions they gain because of higher years of actual experiences. Besides this, they will have outstanding opportunities to be detected and nurtured with their gifted talent at a young age. Furthermore, their talent would be trained by means of official and scientific programs that a homely environment obviously does not provide. From that, the proportion they become specialist in their major will be higher than casual children.

To conclude, the advantages of allowing children to attend school at late age are obscured by its drawbacks. Not to mention, in spite of being safe and meaningful when staying home with parents, children would suffer from ample risks such as addicting to online games, falling in dangerous online scams, which presumably isolate them from positive society. In addition, kids who start their education late will be inferior in terms of social communication skills when compared to other kids. Therefore, I am in favor of parents should take their children to school at a very young age.

Opinions are divided on whether the governments have to provide more public money for discovering alien life or if resolving the immediate concerns of our home planet should be prioritized. While space exploration can be a possibility, I believe that the government should first focus on solving existent issues on Earth.

On the one hand, seeking life across the universe might help us address overpopulation, which is becoming uncontrollably severe nowadays. This is simply because of breakthrough technologies and increased wealth amongst most parts of the world, more people have gotten access to better medical treatment and more nutrient diets, thereby their mortality rate has decreased globally. This is combined with the underutilized contraceptive use of woman, leads to inexorable birth rate in populace size. If scientists are able to successfully build a colony in space where humans can reside, it may help people have a long-term migration.

On the other hand, Iam firmly of the opinion that the public money should be spent on other current issues on this planet. Firstly, the results of exploring life beyond Earth are indefinite because the funding on this journey is exorbitantly expensive and there is no guarantee about time that people can manage to achieve it. Meanwhile, specific problems such as food shortages and poor education need to be solved. Although more people are incapable of starving compared to the past, additional developments in industries, especially agriculture, are required. The authorities need to empower more in machinery, research and training to curb starvation among the underprivileged. Furthermore, education inequality happens locally in all countries, and this requires mass financial investments from the governments. To enhance such problem, extensive funding should be paid for the salaries of pedagogical experts and other staff as well as the costs of creating community schools where people can be provided with a variety of community resources and supports.

To recapitulate, while identifying extraterrestrial life can counter problems correlated with population growth, I presume that the activities including covering a lack of victuals and inferior education are more pragmatic. In the future, were a substantial allocation of budget to be fully diverted to solving Earth-related issues, the exploration of extraterrestrial life can be facilitated.

It is arguable that the advent and the popularity of high-tech equipment, which are used to communicate in their daily life, tend to bring more drawbacks. While I agree that this issue is both beneficial and detrimental, I would argue that it has more advantages.

On the one hand, the rapid development of advanced technologies may cause some disadvantages. The first one is their participation in outdoor activities has been dropped significantly due to the excessive use of smartphones, mobile devices. Students, for instance, have interests in enjoying the virtual world such as online games, social media after finishing their classes instead of taking part in various sports. As a result, the ability of interaction of the teenagers in social activities is likely to shrink more and more. Furthermore, spending too much time using modern technologies such as computers, smartphones may deteriorate one’s health.

On the other hand, it is undeniable that new technologies play a crucial role in the young’s lives thanks to the beneficial effect. Firstly, modern equiments act as effective communication tools that support students in their studies. Whenever they are, they are still able to use their smartphones to improve their English skills through the online app. Secondly, these advanced technologies can help people to keep in touch with their friends or relatives who are living in distant lands. Therefore, no matter how far they are, they still can talk with each other via Facebook for hours for free, which gives them countless opportunities to share stories and strengthen their relationships.

In conclusion, even though some people think that the rapid growth of communication technology brings more disadvantages, I still believe that technology gives more benefits than we think.

In modern society, there has been an ongoing trend towards overcrowding. Several problems have resulted from this tendency and several solutions should be adopted by the governments and individuals to improve the situation.

As the overpopulation of mega cities is increasing, several problems can be anticipated. First, unemployment rate is increasing. Due to movement of people from rural areas to cities in search of jobs, the admission is incredibly competitive. Another problem is that environment is alarmingly contaminated. If the public transport system is poor, people will overuse private vehicles. In fact, massive exhausted emissions released from means of transport have catastrophically exacerbated air pollution. As the result, because of poor air quality and environment degradation people would have respiratory diseases.

Since such issues are serious, the government and individuals should immediately take steps to address these problems. The first solution would be that government would allocate more factories, companies to the countryside and waive tax for companies operating in rural areas to promote more occupational opportunities. The second measures would be funding more green technology and spending more on public transport upgration, which is key to lowering the reliance on carbon-intensive energy resources. For example, the use of electric cars and renewable will help reduce the volume of toxic exhaust fumes.

In conclusion, joblessness and environmental degradation are two driving issues behind overpopulation of cities, and I believe that there are various appropriate steps including movement factories to rural ares and using eco-friendly transports need to be taken to tackle these problems. In my opinion, the situation will be improved greatly within the foreseable future if these measures are properly implemented.